According to the World Population Prospect
2015, published by the United Nations, 66% of the world population will live in
urban space by 2050. To solve the problem of high urban density, sustainable
strategy is quite necessary. Vertical development might be one way. However,
some challenges may be caused by vertical development. For example, the height
(or tall buildings) may cause isolation and bring much danger. Also, when the
building reaches specific height, the vertical transportation inside can be inefficient.
In the design of NYBILLBOARD, a new
horizontal layer is proposed to add to Manhattan. An elevated link, separated
from traffic and noise is constructed to connect two towers. In the linked
part, plenty of public functions, such as bicycle lanes and walkways are
located, which positively introduce the public life into skyline of Manhattan.
Moreover, the NYBILLBOARD Tower may also achieve great
success in sustainable aspects. The 14,000 sqm-area PV-Panels on top is said to
produce approximately 7,200,000KW hrs per year, and the 60m gap between the
main functions will be equipped with helical wind turbine technology. That is
to say, the tower may have potential ability to regenerate around 13% of its
energy needs.
However, this design has not been brought into practice so
far. It somehow reminds me of the design of Shanghai Center Tower. The spiral
tower creates a garden in its double façade every three floors for potential
users to relax after work. However, after the construction, the gardens (or the
‘sky lobby’ called by designers) seems to be quite boring and without any plantation
and public infrastructures. Furthermore, there is no connection between
gardens. Users’ activities may be limited into specific space. To achieve real
public experience in tall buildings is still challenging.
The proposed sky lobby
The constructed sky lobby in Shanghai Tower
In addition, 270 wind turbine generators are built on top of
the Shanghai Center Tower. 1,189,000 KW hrs.
energy is expected to produce annually. Nevertheless, according to a report
published by Shanghai Development and Reform Commission, since the land area of
the city is relatively small, it has no advantages in wind power generation on
land. Recent years, the wind power generation in Shanghai is gradually moved
from land to sea. In consequence, it is quite doubtful whether the tower could
achieve its target in energy supply. To some extend, tall buildings may
naturally be contrast with sustainability. In the construction of Shanghai
Centre Tower, over 400 cement trucks kept working for 63 hours to deposit the concrete
foundation and 1049 concrete columns.
Building skyscrapers with high performance and potential
sustainability seems to be a reasonable strategy nowadays. However, a great
deal of time and attempt is still required to explore the most proper way to
realize sustainability in tall buildings.
Reference:
http://www.gooood.hk/_d271536419.htm?
https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/ch/6413-Is-the-Shanghai-Tower-the-world-s-first-eco-friendly-skyscraper-